Short essay on robert e. lee

Beloved General of the South
  1. Best Books About Robert E. Lee
  2. Article contents
  3. Robert E. Lee
  4. Site Index

New content is added regularly to the website, including online exhibitions , videos , lesson plans, and issues of the online journal History Now, which features essays by leading scholars on major topics in American history.

Lee was faced with a difficult choice: keep fighting in an increasingly hopeless war or surrender to Ulysses S. Lee wrote to Grant and asked to meet to discuss terms of surrender. Throughout the morning, as communications concerning the surrender flew back and forth between Grant and Lee, their troops were still fighting at Appomattox Court House. The next day, Lee issued General Order No. I ask a suspension of hostilities pending the discussion of the Terms of surrender of this army in the interview which I requested in my former communication of Today. After four years of arduous service, marked by unsurpassed courage and fortitude the Army of Northern Virginia has been compelled to yeild [ sic ] to overwhelming numbers.

I need not tell the survivors of so many hard fought battles who have remained steadfast to the last, that I have consented to this result from no distrust of them.

Best Books About Robert E. Lee

But feeling, that valor and devotion could accomplish nothing that would compensate the loss that would attend the continuance of the contest — I determined to avoid the useless sacrifice of those whose finest services have endeared them to their countrymen. By the terms of the agreement Officers and men can return to their homes and remain until exchanged. You will take with you the satisfaction that proceeds from the consciousness of duty faithfully performed, and I earnestly pray that a merciful God will extend to you His blessing and protection — With unceasing admiration of your constancy and devotion to your country, and a grateful remembrance of your kind and generous consideration of myself, I bid you an affectionate farewell.

Those individuals had their love of country, of independence, liberty and freedom threatened. It is up to us — each of us today — to question, to seek the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, on all things… especially what we believe without question. Those well rooted notions that have long since sunk from the conscious thought level down into the sub-conscious realm of practical reality are the very emotionally charged beliefs we should question before simply accepting negative, cynical, even dangerous artful legerdemain of those thoughts and feelings.

Article contents

Oh, there will always be fringe individuals who may collect a small tribe of equally desultory, disorganized, antagonists and anarchists to foment an effect to establish their own autonomy separate and above from the established authority deemed as an illegal regime over them. Remember, FollowTheMoney if you doubt the veracity of the content being presented on whatever media source you ingest on a daily basis. I notice Dubois is treading softly with his audience. Dubois was going easy on the whites of his day by implying that they had long ago progressed beyond lynching.

See a Problem?

How foolish of me. To paraphrase Melville, what need is there to invent divine infectious malevolence, disregard and indifference, as humanity more than covers all the bases? That interpretation tends to fall apart, given that du Bois contrasted these stereotyped atrocities with a London prostitute, rather than leave them as an imperfect statement of universality. And the choice of contrast with the London prostitute is a strange one, given his American audience. The reply button no longer shows up after a discussion here has reached a certain level of nesting.

Du Bois had both the mind of Christ and the mind of a Communist. Karl Marx, recently, has had his genealogy traced to King David, and therefore to the Christ. Du Bois, in his careful admission letter to the Communist Party U. To Du Bois, communism through Marx was not only no crime, but the clear route to advancing human civilization. This article and many of the comments below it seem to suggest that Lincoln and the North fought the war in some significant sense as a moral response against slavery when the historical record suggests, at best, that Lincoln was a very late convert in terms of opposition to slavery, and certainly well after the war started.

Removing the legacy of the Confederacy is obviously harder than toppling a few statues. The removal of a few dozen recetly has taken over years, due to white supremacy advocate opposition. One as far north as Seattle, which the mayor recently announced his intention of removing, along with the statue of Vladimir Lenin. No doubt the Lenin statue was placed in Seattle by the unionization Labor movement of the s, fighting for worker rights like the 8 hour work day, safety and health benefits.

Clay Risen has quoted letters by written by Robert E. Lee that have been collected by archivists and historians over the years, one of the most famous was written to his wife in Robert E. One has only to look at Robert E. Norris said that he and others at Arlington were indeed told by Mr. Lee had told them they must stay for five more years. So Mr. Norris said he, a sister and a cousin tried to escape in , but were caught. Gwin, our overseer, who was ordered by Gen. And when the overseer declined to wield the lash, a constable stepped up, Mr.

Norris said. He added that Gen. Lee, the memorials to the traitors to the USA, who took up arms to defend the legalization of murder, torture and rape of innocent human beings based upon their race should be dismantled to preserve the peace and potentials for progress of the nation. The propaganda supporting white supremacy is filling with many lies, non-the least of which is Egyptology, and the attempt by some to mentally remove the nation of Egypt, ancient KMT, the first recorded nation on earth, from the continent of Africa in which it has eternally been actually situated.

Robert E. Lee

African philosophies flowing from the older more experienced and mature branch of original humanity which spread from the Nile Valley temples through ancient Gaul, Greece, Indus Valley, Rome, China and around the world to Fiji and the South Seas nations. Then the Africans could not be truly inherently inferior.

  1. Senate building design thesis.
  2. essay writing rubric grade 8.
  3. W.E.B. DuBois?
  4. The Battle of Chancellorsville Essay - Words | Bartleby.

In that historical frame work the Trans Atlantic slave trade and years of discrimination since , was a pay back to Africa for years of North African rule of souther Europe. But that does not mean it is not a fact. There is zero proof that Lee was whipping slaves, even Wesley Norris. Norris is the only person, whoever used his or her name to claim Lee whipped anyone, as far as I know.

Site Index

Why would Mr. Norris do this so many years after the alleged whipping incident? At the very time Mr. Norris used his name publicly to defame Robert E. Lee, Mr. So, it seems that Mr. Thus, the Norris story seems to have been part of newspaper campaign to influence Congress.

Also, the Norris story seems to be an incomplete account which was trying to hide something. Thanks, Tom Forehand, Jr. At the time, the nation was composed of individual states each having a complex history and a sovereign sense. We would not recognize today the mindset of these people who belonged to individual states. We are a transient people. I would argue that the Civil War was fought by the South out of a sense of honor, more than anything else. What is that honor? I have the feeling that slavery, while certainly an overriding issue, become secondary as the days went by, until at least the day when Lee suggested the South recruit blacks for its army.

Lincoln would have sent the slaves to Africa, had he the power. The South fought literally to their deaths in hopes of holding on to the power to enslave and cruelly exploit black people for their own gain. With all due respect…DuBois needs no amendment here.

  • Robert E. Lee!
  • Dates and Eras:.
  • oryx and crake essay thesis!
  • The land actually belonged to Natives after all. Here we condemn the south, and make sure to point out that they lost. And why was the north all of those things? Well, just because they won, of course. The winners are always in an advantageous position of being the ones who write the history books. They get to make themselves out as the valiant heroes, and the losers, the evil ones. We often forget that our country was born of treason.

    Robert E. Lee - Confederate Forces Leader In America's Civil War - Mini Bio - BIO

    We raised a rebellion against the crown. What fought for what we thought was right, against something which we thought was wrong. And we won, and therefore won the right to decide what the history books would say. This has played and continues to play out all over the world. The only difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter, or a rebel and a revolutionary is the victor. I never deny what the south did, but those who have decided to hate the south, always conveniently forget everything about the north.

    Several northern states still held slaves right up until the end of the war. The civil war was not fought to end slavery.

    • Quick Facts?
    • thesis inventory system documentation.
    • cover letter for industrial maintenance technician.
    • Robert E. Lee.
    • Making Sense of Robert E. Lee | History | Smithsonian.
    • It was to bring the southern states which seceded back into the union. The northern states had been pushing their will on the south for quite a long time, and they were reaching a breaking point. At that time, as another commenter has noted, states were much more independent, and the federal government was not all powerful like it is now.

      Visual aid shown here. The tariff is a non-starter. In fact, under the Kansas-Nebraska Act the federal government was letting the people of a territory decide whether it would be a free or slave state. If anything, the federal government was not being restrictive in that matter. Oddly, a study of US history from that time period shows a federal government doing the exact opposite.

      It seems that the southern states were imposing their will on the northern states with the Fugitive Slave Act, the lowering of the tariff to its lowest level, preventing a transcontinental railroad, preventing the passing of a Homestead Act, the repeal of the Missouri Compromise and its replacement with the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and finally, the Dred Scott decision.